Today the European Commission launched consultation on the future of European judicial training

February 1st, 2018 § 0 comments § permalink

On 1 February 2018 the European Commission launched consultation on Training of justice professionals on EU law.

This consultation is open to all citizens and stakeholders interested in the future of European judicial training. The replies will be taken into account when evaluating the 2011 European judicial training strategy and when designing the new European judicial training strategy for 2019-2025.

In 2011, the European Commission adopted a long-term strategy on European Judicial Training which sets specific objectives for the training of justice professionals to be reached by 2020.

European judicial training covers the training of justice professionals on all EU legislation, including EU judicial cooperation instruments as well as the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights and the Union’s core values such as the rule of law.

The justice professionals are the practitioners involved in the justice system such as judges, prosecutors, court staff, bailiffs or enforcement officers, lawyers, notaries, mediators, legal interpreters and translators, court experts, prison management and staff, probation officers.

The questionnaire is accessible in English, French and German. Contributions may be submitted in any of the official EU languages. This public consultation is complemented by a targeted questionnaire addressed to the main stakeholders (EU-level training providers for justice professionals, EU-level representatives of justice professions and EU-level associations of justice professionals).

Consultation period: 1 February 2018 – 26 April 2018.

The Training Committee of the CCBE as usual will provide its contribution.

The training of lawyers in the 21st century

January 30th, 2018 § 0 comments § permalink

Jarkko Männistö, Asianajaja presenting his paper in Brussels at the CCNE Training conference on 14th December 2017

Jarkko Männistö, Asianajaja presenting his paper in Brussels at the CCBE Training conference on 14th December 2017

This is a short blog by Jarkko Männistö, Asianajaja, OTT outlining key points from his intervention at the CCBE conference on Training of Lawyers, challenges and opportunities, Brussels, 14 December 2017.

I have been teaching advocacy to students, bar exam candidates, and experienced attorneys for almost 15 years. What I have learned, through a series of trials and errors, is that students learn what they want to learn. And only what they want to learn.

Based on this experience I argue that continuing legal education in the 21st century should, above all, be a positive experience to those we wish to educate.

The following are, what I consider, the four cornerstones of the positive learning experience.

Go online, go live
Lawyers are chronically time constrained. So take legal education online whenever you can. If a lawyer can save an hour or two of travel time, he or she just might spend a good part of the time saved learning something new.

If you want to lecture, broadcast it live. Livestream lecture with a real time chat is a great way on engaging students from the comfort of their own office or home.

Show, don’t tell
Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach. If you do not agree with this, show your students how it’s done. It’s easy enough to say that you should write clearly and concisely. Following that instruction is the hard part.

Lawyers must apply law to concrete problems. Continuing legal education should help them do that, which is why continuing legal education should be all about application.

Doing is learning
Sitting still and listening someone talk about the law is, even for most lawyers, dreadfully boring. Don’t put your students’ brain into hibernation.

Instead, activate your students. Ask questions. Create problems. Make them do the work, because that’s what learning requires. Hard work. Doing stuff with your brain. Not having it done for you by someone else (the teacher).

Be a coach
People avoid things which cause them embarrasment. Never make people feel bad about themselves, because most of them will not study harder to avoid further embarrasment. Instead, they will take the easy way out, which is to avoid your lectures.

So, accept everyone come in “as is”. You have succeeded as a teacher, if they leave equipped with more knowledge than they came in. And more importantly, with a hunger to learn more.

Jarkko Männistö
Attorney, LL.D.

This posting is an adaptation of the speech Jarkko gave on 14 December in Brussels in the CCBE Seminar titled “Training of lawyers, challenges and opportunities”.



ABA Futures Commission issues final report on the future of legal services in the United States

August 19th, 2016 § 0 comments § permalink


After two years of research and analysis, the Futures Commission of the Amercian Bar Association has recently issued its final report on the future of legal services in the United States. The report documents the challenges that the legal profession is facing and it contains ten recommendations.

Amongst others, the report also addresses the future of education and training of lawyers. Recommendation 7.2 provides:

Law schools and bar associations, including the ABA, should offer more continuing legal education and other opportunities for lawyers to study entrepreneurship, innovation, the business and economics of law practice, and other relevant disciplines.

Experts on the use of technology in legal services delivery have emphasized the importance of providing lawyers with new skills and knowledge: “Training in law practice management and law practice technology is a critical solution that will further align the skills that law students must have upon graduation with the employment needs of a radically changing legal market.” With the legal market changing dramatically, lawyers today “more than any generation of lawyers … will have to be entrepreneurs rather than employees working for somebody else.” Moreover, lawyers who learn entrepreneurial skills can help solve the justice gap. With millions of people needing legal representation and thousands of lawyers unemployed or underemployed, students with this training can “create better delivery models that match appropriately qualified lawyerswith the clients who need them. […]”

The American Bar Association will now establish a Center for Innovation to map the way forward.

The final report of the ABA Futures Commission is available here.

An interview on the Future of Legal Services and Training of Lawyers

November 5th, 2015 § 0 comments § permalink

Interview with Thierry Wickers, Head of the French delegation to the CCBE

Thierry Wickers / Président du Conseil National des BarreauxThierry Wickers / Président du Conseil National des Barreaux

Thierry Wickers

You published a book last year on « La grande transformation des avocats ». Can you tell us about it – what are the drivers of this transformation of lawyers?

In « La grande transformation », I was first interested by the evolution of the relation of lawyers with the market, highlighting the significant influence of EU legislation. With its sectorial directives of 1977 and 1998, the EU seemed to take fully into account the specificity of lawyers, but then has tended more and more to consider them as any other profession of services. However, tackling the challenge of innovation should probably be the priority. All intellectual professions must adapt to the digital revolution and to the developments in artificial intelligence. But lawyers have to face one phenomenon in particular: that information technologies have facilitated the entry of new actors into the legal market. All law firms are solution shops. Those new actors develop new business models, different from the solution shop. They seem able to deliver simpler, more understandable and cheaper legal services.

What are the main challenges for lawyers’ training in this context?

Lawyers are perfectly structured to deliver personalized advice that address specific legal issues submitted to them; they deliver “bespoke” advice for relatively high costs. This requires high-level legal skills and very little else. It is now necessary to promote a positive environment for innovation for young lawyers and to stop encouraging only the reproduction of what already exists. Lawyers need to master a great deal of other knowledge. They also need to acquire a genuine entrepreneurial spirit. So far lawyers’ training was only learning “in business” skills. It is now necessary to promote “on business” skills. We need to implement a deep reform of initial training in order to avoid a situation where lawyers are very well trained to face issues that do no longer exist.

Has your Bar – i.e. le Conseil National des Barreaux de France – started considering the impact of these challenges on the training of lawyers?

In France, initial training of lawyers requires a law degree, and then, candidates need to pass an exam to access a Bar School. This part of the training is essentially financed by the lawyers themselves and is controlled by the National Bar Council (CNB), which runs the Bar Schools’ network. The CNB decided that schools should provide a minimum training on information technologies and on the evolution of the profession. This is a start. Furthermore, each school can freely dispose of 20% of the training time. Some of them already go beyond the minimum requirement. However, the profession cannot lose interest in what is happening at the University where future lawyers spend 5 years or more, only learning about the law!

How do you believe can Bars and Law Societies across Europe best meet these challenges and what is the CCBE’s role?

Bars can take initiatives in several areas. The Paris Bar has set up an ‘incubator’ in order to disseminate new ideas. Some initiatives, as the “Justice Entrepreneurial Project” of the Chicago Bar, deserve consideration and should be imitated. Bars have a crucial role to play in the area of professional regulation. They must interpret the regulation in order to make it evolve and to facilitate innovative practices; they also have to remove barriers to the development of law firms and enable them to face new competitors as mentioned above.

The European Commission now seems committed to act in the crucial area of platforms and the CCBE, which is its interlocutor, will have an essential role to play. Moreover, the CCBE, given its position, is the only one which has access to information about national trends and reactions of European bars. Its decision to put in place a working group dedicated to the future of legal services is very important, as well as the fact that it is interested in the initiatives taken by other national and international organizations of lawyers. In October 2016, in Paris, the CCBE will hold a symposium about all these issues. It will be an important moment to mobilize all European lawyers and show them that the representative bodies are ready to meet the challenges of the future.